Web Licensing Needs to Be More Granular

<geek alert>

Presently, all the blogs I’ve looked at (I readily concede there are blogs that I have not looked at ;) ) which assign a license to their content do it on a page or global level. Read more…

Posted in Events, General Discussion, Microformat and Mark-up

Getting the Ball Rolling: Formats for Licensing and Attribution

So even a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step, right?  I think I heard that somewhere before…

With that in mind here’s some preliminary thinking on a licensing and attribution format. Read more…

Posted in Licensing & Attribution, Microformat and Mark-up

Ubiquity Illustrates Impressive Thinking and the Need for Attribution Microformat

The net was a buzz with with Aza Raskin’s post on Ubiquity: An experiment into connecting the Web with language. Read more…

Posted in Events, Licensing & Attribution, Microformat and Mark-up, Technology Innovation

The Long Trail

Lucas Gonze just blogged about our endeavours here and brought some very interesting points to light. Read more…

Posted in Copyright, Licensing & Attribution, Media, Microformat and Mark-up

The Need for an Attribution Trail

When content is being reused from one source to another, etiquette and ethics would insist that the content creator (the person reusing content) provide clear attribution and links to the original content while obeying the content’s license.

When searching for an example of proper attribution, I had to go no further than Miss 604’s blog, aka Rebecca Bollwitt. She often reuses other people’s photos in her popular blog, all of which are meticulously attributed and linked.

(Note: she has even created a screencast tutorial on how she gets captions under her photos in order to give proper attribution. You should check it out. Many of us want to do the right thing, but we are often too lazy or sloppy when using other people’s content. There’s really no excuse for not doing this.)

However, what happens when I want to reuse content I found on Rebecca’s blog, that is coming from someone else. I want to reuse the picture of Roger Bannister’s statue that Rebecca reused. Now, I could simply repost the picture from Squeaky Marmot and provide proper attribution.


Squeaky Marmot on Flickr

That would satisfy my legal and ethical requirement, but is it good etiquette? I didn’t find the picture on Squeaky Marmot’s Flickr account. I was reading Rebecca’s bog, and I never would have found Squeaky Marmot’s picture otherwise.

I think simply reposting the picture without some sort of additional attribution to Miss604.com loses vital information. Neither Squeaky Marmot nor Rebecca know that I found the picture through reading the Miss 604 blog. Both of those people have a vested interest in knowing how I found the picture. So, I should give attribution to both Miss 604 and Squeaky Marmot as per below.

Vancouver History: The Miracle Mile


Copied Source www.miss604.com Original Source Squeaky Marmot

I’m now kind of concerned with what to call “Attribution”. In the Creative Commons attribution is a legal term, but what I really want to relate is:

  1. From where did I find the content: Miss 604’s blog. (The Copied Source)
  2. From where did the original content come from: Squeaky Marmot (The Original Source or at least the source Miss 604 found)

Do you reuse content? Do others reuse your content? If so, what do you think? How would you like to see the “attribution”?

Posted in Ethical Reuse, Events, Licensing & Attribution, Microformat and Mark-up, RDFa, Technology Innovation

Project supporters

Donat Group Nitobi Taunt Media
PlayTheWeb.org is an ad hoc group of Web professionals who are interested in promoting the idea of "Web Play" through the ethical reuse of content on the Web. We want to report, discuss, and promote Technologies, Techniques, Applications, and Business models that move this idea forward.